Canadian court decisions related to interview, interrogation and confession issues

Written By: Reid
Jul 25, 2013
For several years now Gino Arcaro has been writing a column for Reid Institute Members that we have posted on our RI Members page about various Canadian court decisions that are related to interview, interrogation and confession issues. We are listing several of them for our general audience. We have listed below the titles of several of these columns, and then a link to a document that will give you the first few paragraphs of the article then a link to the complete piece.
  • July 2012---Attack on Reid technique fails. Failed attempt to prove a false confession.
  • June 2012---"Significance of Exculpatory statements from the Stafford homicide"
  • May 2012---Offer of help may jeopardize confession admissibility
  • March 2012---The balance of power: close the "Sophistication Gap."
  • January 2012---"Stick to offence, not defense"
  • October 2010---Right to Silence versus The Caution - The mystery
  • November 2010---Oct. 8, 2010 - Landmark Decision Day Part I
  • November 2010---No cross-border right to lawyer/right to silence: Oct. 8, 2010 ñ Landmark Decision Day Part 2
  • May 2009---Admissibility of young person's confession. Traditionally unlawful inducements are not always strong enough to exclude.
  • January 2009---The 24-hour Clock: The relationship between sec. 503 C.C. and the duration of an interrogation Part 1
Continue Reading